Social media is now an everyday part of our personal and working lives. As a result, the distinction between what is private and what is public can become blurred.
This has consequences for both the employee and employer. Inappropriate social media use by an employee could amount to misconduct and lead to disciplinary action including dismissal. Equally, employers who access an employee’s private social media account may be infringing their human rights.
The Human Rights Act 1998 provides:
In Barbulescu v Romania an employer asked an employee to create a Yahoo account to respond to clients’ inquiries. The employee used it to send and receive personal messages. After monitoring his account, the employer dismissed him, and his claim that his rights to respect for private and family life under Article 8 had been breached was ultimately rejected by the court.
However, this case does not mean that employers are free to monitor employees’ private communications. Whether the right to a private life is infringed depends on whether the employee has a ‘reasonable expectation’ of privacy. In this case, the employee’s contract specifically forbade the personal use of work computers.
Where an employee makes a public comment about their employer, even outside work, and the employer subsequently objects, a court is unlikely to find that the worker’s right to freedom of expression has been breached. But if the employer is not mentioned by name, courts may consider that there has been no damage to their reputation.
Employers who monitor employees’ use of social media where the employee has a reasonable expectation of privacy may be in breach of the implied term of trust and confidence if they have acted unreasonably and without proper cause.
Where an employer accesses an employee’s personal data they must comply with the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA), which is intended to provide safeguards on the use of personal data.
The Information Commissioner’s Office has produced an Employment Practices code, which gives detailed guidance on monitoring at work. In short, it recommends that employers:
The best way to balance the rights of employees with protection for employers is to formulate a clear social media policy. The policy should be widely publicised and all staff trained on it. A good social media policy should include the following:
Employers should also make clear that using social media to harass colleagues because of a protected characteristic (such as age, disability, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation) is unlawful under the Equality Act 2010.
Jo Seery is a professional support lawyer with Thompsons Solicitors. Legal Eye does not offer legal advice on individual cases. MiP members in need of personal advice should immediately contact their MiP national officer.
If you’d like to read more from MiP, sign up to receive our free monthly emails – we’ll keep you up to date on news and events in health and care management
Flexible and hybrid working are widespread in the NHS but employer attitudes vary and can change suddenly. Jo Seery explains your legal rights if you want to change the way you work.
When employers are making redundancies, it’s often wrongly assumed that people on fixed-term contracts will go first. But these staff do have rights, sometimes even after their contracts expire. Jo Seery explains.
With redundancies happening all over the NHS in England, remember that your employer has a legal duty to consult with you and your union—and that consultation must be ‘meaningful’. Sarah Schnider explains.
Managers in Partnership is the only dedicated union to managers working in healthcare. We understand the value you add to healthcare services. We will always support you and champion your work. Sign up today and stand alongside thousands of your peers.
